⚖️🪶 MA’AT Governance Suite Ubuntu Predictive Analytics · a Black Swan Technologies company

Hold power to its own rules.

A nonprofit suite of engines that check government — one for each job of each branch. Each one answers by matching your case to a real, known example, and shows its work so you can check it yourself.

stays silent← MATCH→makes it up

Match, not guess. Most software today guesses — it makes up an answer and hopes you don’t check. These engines do the older, safer thing: they match. Every answer points to a real, known example that fits your case, and shows you which one. If nothing real fits, it says so plainly instead of bluffing. It’s the same way we’ve trusted fingerprints, DNA, and x-rays for a hundred years — by matching what’s in front of us to what we already know, not by rolling the dice.

⚖️ Judicial 9 engines

The courtroom: rules, charges, standing, conviction integrity.

Alabama Civil Procedure

checked against · Alabama Rules of Civil Procedure + verified Ala. appellate holdings

Matches a pleading or motion against verbatim ARCP rule text and machine-verified Alabama holdings.

LIVEopen →

Alabama Evidence

checked against · Alabama Rules of Evidence + Ala. Code § 12-21-160

Matches an evidentiary question to ARE rule text and Alabama's Daubert statute.

ANCHOREDopen →

Contract Law

checked against · Formation doctrine + Ala. Code § 8-9-2 + UCC Art. 2

Matches contract facts to formation elements, the Statute of Frauds, and UCC Article 2.

ANCHOREDopen →

Federal Civil Procedure

checked against · Federal Rules of Civil Procedure (verbatim)

Matches a federal filing to the governing Federal Rule of Civil Procedure.

ANCHOREDopen →

FTCA Technician

checked against · 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346(b), 2671-2680 + accrual case law

Matches a tort-against-the-United-States fact pattern to FTCA elements, § 2680 exceptions, and accrual.

ANCHOREDopen →

Jury-Charge Detector

checked against · Pattern jury instructions vs. the charge as read

Matches a given jury charge against the pattern instruction it should mirror; flags the delta.

DESIGNopen →

Standing Seat

checked against · Article III standing + justiciability doctrine

Matches a claim to the Article III standing / justiciability posture it actually occupies.

DESIGNopen →

Material Injustice Lead Detector

checked against · Forcing authority (Martinez, Trevino, Coleman, Lee v. Kemna) + the ground courts actually reversed on

Reads a conviction record and flags the joints where a material injustice may live — a LEAD for a lawyer to verify, never a verdict. (Engine reproduced 93.8% precision / 8.7% coverage on the validation set; post-conviction remedy match: the ground the court actually reversed on lands in the top 3 in 100% of resolved reversals, top pick 74%.)

LIVEopen →

Post-Conviction Matching

checked against · Post-conviction relief lanes by jurisdiction

Matches a post-conviction posture to the relief lane that fits it.

DESIGNopen →

🏛️ Executive 7 engines

The agency: discretion, foreseeable harm, disclosure, device use.

📜 Legislative 3 engines

The statute: conformance, riders, lobbying disclosure.

🧪 Market & Method 4 engines

Cross-cutting integrity: manipulation, monoculture, liability drift.